Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2001 18:41:12 -0400 From: Ted Sikora <tsikora@home.com> To: "freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG" <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: JFS Message-ID: <3B479008.19BFE7F2@home.com> References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107080938430.326-100000@vimfuego.saarinen.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Juha Saarinen wrote: > > On Sat, 7 Jul 2001, Dave Uhring wrote: > > > I use "logging" on Solaris and XFS on Linux and have tried reiserfs on > > Linux. All are superior to UFS/softupdates when the going gets tough. > > Disk access times may or may not be comparable with UFS/softupdates, but > > the integrity of my filesystems is more important than raw speed. > > Hmmm... that's one reason I've not implemented ReiserFS on my Linux box. > Read too many horror stories about how it eats your file system, and how > it doesn't work with NFS etc. Absolutely false. Works perfectly... I have had it on several machines for about a year with absolutely no problems .. nada. On the other hand UFS/softupdates is pretty reliable itself albiet a little pokier. I haven't seen fsck in action for so long I almost forgot it existed. Reiserfs would be nice on FreeBSD though. IBM's JFS might be even better. -- Ted Sikora admin@unixos2.org http://www.unixos2.org http://www.powerusersbbs.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3B479008.19BFE7F2>