Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:49:15 -0700 From: Gregory Shapiro <gshapiro@gshapiro.net> To: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Cc: arch@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BIND in the base (Was: Re: tmux(1) in base) Message-ID: <20090923004915.GQ19207@rugsucker.local> In-Reply-To: <20090922213451.GC84817@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20090921112657.GW95398@hoeg.nl> <20090922135435.36a3d40e@lazybytes.org> <4AB90448.9020706@FreeBSD.org> <19e9a5dc0909221014o14e88c96ubf32142b85d781d@mail.gmail.com> <20090922173517.GB63149@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20090922200449.GL19207@rugsucker.local> <19e9a5dc0909221329j5757c3f7kc23e94ea8f26a05@mail.gmail.com> <20090922204356.GM19207@rugsucker.local> <20090922213451.GC84817@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> If sendmail is replaced by dma, will it receive the same level of > care? I guess this is considered to be a dubious concern by some. It is a valid concern, but not one I can comment on (i.e., I would not be able to maintain it).
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090923004915.GQ19207>