Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2000 09:09:06 -0700 (MST) From: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com> To: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com> Cc: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams), stable@FreeBSD.ORG, Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami <asami@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: libc shlib version Message-ID: <200011161609.JAA04489@nomad.yogotech.com> In-Reply-To: <48719.974354306@winston.osd.bsdi.com> References: <nate@yogotech.com> <200011152253.PAA00534@nomad.yogotech.com> <48719.974354306@winston.osd.bsdi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > It's not just the library that's change, so bumping the libc bersion > > will not solve the kernel incompatability problems. > > That depends on what value of "solve" you're shooting for, and you > know that well enough. I know that well enough, and the folks working on the problem are also bright enough to know that as well. If it was a simple solution, it would have been solved already. A manager saying 'solve it already' won't make it happen any faster. :) :) :) :) Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200011161609.JAA04489>