Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 27 Dec 1998 19:26:59 +0100
From:      Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
To:        obrien@FreeBSD.ORG
Cc:        Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/share/man/man4/man4.i386 Makefile pcvt.4 src/sys/i386/isa/pcvt pcvt_conf.h pcvt_drv.c pcvt_ext.c pcvt_hdr.h pcvt_kbd.c pcvt_kbd.h pcvt_out.c pcvt_sup.c pcvt_tbl.h pcvt_vtf.c src/sys/i386/conf GENERIC LINT files.i386 
Message-ID:  <68632.914783219@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 27 Dec 1998 10:14:14 PST." <19981227101414.B12867@dragon.nuxi.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <19981227101414.B12867@dragon.nuxi.com>, "David O'Brien" writes:
>> >Poul, I know that there is work afoot to make a vt emulator for syscons
>> >but isn't this a bit premature?
>> 
>> No, if anything it should have been done long time ago, because
>> the existence of PCVT has put a damper on the effort to make a VT
>> emulation for syscons.
>
>But why pull it out of 3.0.1?  Pretty radical change from 3.0.0 -> 3.0.1.
>Why not wait until after 3.0-STABLE and yank it from 3.1-CURRENT? 

Well I agree we should have, but rather now than later.

>Hell, NFS is partially broken.  Why don't we yank it out?  The existence
>of the current code keeps anyone from starting a fresh NFS subsystem that
>works well.

NFS is too widely used for such a tactic, but a well working NFS 
implementaion would be most welcome.

--
Poul-Henning Kamp             FreeBSD coreteam member
phk@FreeBSD.ORG               "Real hackers run -current on their laptop."
"ttyv0" -- What UNIX calls a $20K state-of-the-art, 3D, hi-res color terminal

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?68632.914783219>