Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 27 May 2009 06:58:32 +0100
From:      Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk>
To:        Gary Gatten <Ggatten@waddell.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD & Software RAID
Message-ID:  <4A1CD688.4020604@infracaninophile.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <70C0964126D66F458E688618E1CD008A0793ED94@WADPEXV0.waddell.com>
References:  <4A1AA3DC.5020300@network-i.net>	<200905261238.52979.kirk@strauser.com><70C0964126D66F458E688618E1CD008A0793ED91@WADPEXV0.waddell.com> <4A1C3725.8040509@infracaninophile.co.uk> <70C0964126D66F458E688618E1CD008A0793ED94@WADPEXV0.waddell.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enigF2076FCEF20B8F548BB610DD
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Gary Gatten wrote:
> What about with PAE and/or other extension schemes?

Doesn't help with the KVM requirement, and still only provides a 4GB addr=
ess
space for any single process.
=20
> If it's just memory requirements, can I assume if I don't have a $hit
> load of storage and billions of files it will work "ok" with 4GB of RAM=
?
> I guess I'm just making sure there isn't some bug that only exists on
> the i386 architecture?

ZFS should work on i386.  As far as I know there aren't any killer bugs t=
hat
are architecture specific, but I'm no expert. Unless your aim is to learn=
 about
ZFS I personally wouldn't bother with it on an i386 system: you'll almost=

certainly get a lot better performance and a lot less grief out of UFS un=
der
those conditions.

	Cheers,

	Matthew

--=20
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.                   7 Priory Courtyard
                                                  Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey     Ramsgate
                                                  Kent, CT11 9PW


--------------enigF2076FCEF20B8F548BB610DD
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEAREIAAYFAkoc1ogACgkQ8Mjk52CukIwZ2gCcCUlxsGyz92Oa48QLaqwEDBMs
ylEAoInLE56Ai6iGvYwXZd/+cKfN0iur
=dy+4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enigF2076FCEF20B8F548BB610DD--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A1CD688.4020604>