Date: Tue, 26 Aug 1997 12:24:35 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Pechter <pechter@lakewood.com> To: rdkeys@csemail.cropsci.ncsu.edu Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD on low end boxes Message-ID: <199708261624.MAA00502@i4got.lakewood.com> In-Reply-To: <9708261442.AA133031@csemail.cropsci.ncsu.edu> from "rdkeys@csemail.cropsci.ncsu.edu" at "Aug 26, 97 10:42:24 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Some of > > us even have older, slower hardware than the core team. ;^) (This > > message is being chiseled into the electrons on a 486/66, for instance.) > > Well, this dummy's boxes are half a dozen lowendian 386/486 junkers, and > I really can't complain, at all, since 2.1.7.1/2.2.x/3.0.x is up and > running fine on all of them. What I was after was a rock stable unchanging > system for the home boxes (2.1.7.1 is fine there), a good carefree system > for the office boxes (2.2-RELENG is fine there) and one 3.0 play box > (current is fine there). Your detailed explanation helped immensely. > What was confusing me was what the 2.2 stable actually was. > > > (Yes, this is a mild slam directed at Linux, the various SVR4 PC > > platforms, and especially SCO.) > > I run aix/minix/linux/FreeBSd, and support your slam, although there > is one source that I can compile fine on suns/aix/linux but it blows up > every gcc on every version of FreeBSD (runs fine on gcc on the sun and the > linux box, tho). I am still scratching my head on that one. Krazy parsing > error with no evident code anomalies. Wierd. I've got AIX, Linux and FreeBSD as well, the Linux use is mostly because FreeBSD doesn't run on token ring... My old play box is a 386/25 going to a 486/66 -- since the 386 is going to be a print server. My stuff ranges from 386sx to AMD 586/133 (basically an upgraded 486/33). I'm amazed how much more stable the BSD is than a number of commercial Unix boxes I ran a couple of years ago... (SunOS4.1.3, Solaris 2.3, HPUX9.0.x). While Linux seems faster when run single user on low end boxes, FreeBSD seems more solid there. (However, Linux used to run on more old, low-end disk controllers.) A friend of mine is going to FreeBSD after Linux stopped working with his Mitsumi double speed CDROM... FreeBSD worked just fine with it. Bill
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199708261624.MAA00502>