Date: 19 Jun 2001 13:45:47 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: "Karsten W. Rohrbach" <karsten@rohrbach.de> Cc: Lloyd Rennie <lloyd@vbc.net>, fs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: fsck query Message-ID: <xzp8zio1yms.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <20010619130905.F30037@mail.webmonster.de> References: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10106181613200.94480-100000@brunel.uk1.vbc.net> <xzp4rtd8xl5.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20010619130905.F30037@mail.webmonster.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Karsten W. Rohrbach" <karsten@rohrbach.de> writes: > one might note that this specific issue is addressed by diskcheckd by > ben/phk in -current. according to phk the MFC to -stable is on it's way, > perhaps it is already committed. No, diskcheckd(8) serves a different purpose: it tries to trigger surface errors early while they can still be circumvented by remapping the damaged sectors. That's not quite the same as discovering and reporting existing surface errors. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzp8zio1yms.fsf>