Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 20:07:56 -0400 From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org> To: tyler@tysdomain.com Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: periodic: condensing mails Message-ID: <447g4ff5b7.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> In-Reply-To: <53A09B63.50805@tysdomain.com> (Tyler Littlefield's message of "Tue, 17 Jun 2014 15:47:47 -0400") References: <53A09B63.50805@tysdomain.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Littlefield, Tyler" <tyler@tysdomain.com> writes: > I was reading this article: > http://deranfangvomende.wordpress.com/2014/05/11/freebsd-periodic-mails-v= s-monitoring/ > where it mentions this: > I found turning off certain things like the =93security mail=94 also > disables portaudit DB updates. But I just changed my portaudit call to > include the download. > Somehow I had assumed that *update* would be separate from *report*. > Is this still an issue? If so, how have people fixed it? I'm looking > at condensing this (I'm dumping all failed ssh logins into a > blacklist, so I don't need to know about them). I get a lot of > material and sometimes it's a ton to read through. I'm really not clear on what you're doing exactly.=20 Maybe what you're looking for is daily_status_security_inline rather than disabling specific checks?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?447g4ff5b7.fsf>