Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 19:26:11 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua> To: Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net> Cc: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Subject: Re: usbd_set_config_no vs. usbd_set_config_index Message-ID: <46C47AA3.4040809@icyb.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <200708161815.47620.hselasky@c2i.net> References: <46C2D04A.30409@icyb.net.ua> <200708151741.47907.hselasky@c2i.net> <46C44280.6010908@icyb.net.ua> <200708161815.47620.hselasky@c2i.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 16/08/2007 19:15 Hans Petter Selasky said the following: > Hi, > > I would say that "usbd_set_config_index()" is more reliable and faster > than "usbd_set_config_no()". I tried to get rid of > all "usbd_set_config_no()". Hmm, then I am puzzled how my change from *_index() to *_no() helped in my case. Maybe some parameters were incorrect, or maybe different devices need different parameters and that's where _no() comes useful. -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?46C47AA3.4040809>