Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 18:41:16 +0200 From: Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua> Cc: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Subject: Re: usbd_set_config_no vs. usbd_set_config_index Message-ID: <200708161841.17660.hselasky@c2i.net> In-Reply-To: <46C47AA3.4040809@icyb.net.ua> References: <46C2D04A.30409@icyb.net.ua> <200708161815.47620.hselasky@c2i.net> <46C47AA3.4040809@icyb.net.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 16 August 2007, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 16/08/2007 19:15 Hans Petter Selasky said the following: > > Hi, > > > > I would say that "usbd_set_config_index()" is more reliable and faster > > than "usbd_set_config_no()". I tried to get rid of > > all "usbd_set_config_no()". > > Hmm, then I am puzzled how my change from *_index() to *_no() helped in > my case. Maybe some parameters were incorrect, or maybe different > devices need different parameters and that's where _no() comes useful. What config number are you setting? Have you dumped the configuration of your device using "udesc_dump" (See /usr/ports/sysutils/udesc_dump) ? --HPS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200708161841.17660.hselasky>