Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:59:57 +0700 From: Dian Candra <dian@spin.net.id> To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Using PF + ALTQ in FreeBSD 6.2 Message-ID: <46C063DD.50008@spin.net.id> In-Reply-To: <46C0562A.8060201@rxsec.com> References: <46BFD392.2020804@spin.net.id> <20070813043049.GA32692@verio.net> <46C0562A.8060201@rxsec.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Yes, it's work with Dummynet well, cause I'm using dummynet for some years. The problem is, with dummynet I could not do "borrow" bandwidth from the parent. So, I should move to ALTQ+PF, but unfortunately I'm facing a problem with it. Please give me some comment, If I use ALTQ+PF in my router, it's really could not limit incoming and outgoing traffic from/to my client ? Does no one have a bettter experience ? regards, Dian Chris Marlatt wrote: > David DeSimone wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> I'm curious what you think your router can do to prevent hosts on the >> internet from sending traffic too fast. >> >> Once you have received the packets, it is too late to limit their >> arrival rate. >> > > Can't ipfw do this through dummynet? It seems to work fine for me in my > tests. > > Now yes it's not really preventing them from sending traffic, but it > should still be able to queue it and invoke latency to simulate a slower > link/pipe. > > Regards, > > Chris > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-pf-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?46C063DD.50008>