Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2008 22:10:43 +0900 (JST) From: Takahashi Yoshihiro <nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org> To: imp@bsdimp.com Cc: ed@80386.nl, arch@freebsd.org, sam@freebsd.org, xcllnt@mac.com, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MPSAFE TTY schedule [uart vs sio] Message-ID: <20080704.221043.226715262.nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20080704.063540.1210476607.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <486D4006.2050303@freebsd.org> <993E865A-A426-4036-9E09-A87D7474DE80@mac.com> <20080704.063540.1210476607.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <20080704.063540.1210476607.imp@bsdimp.com> "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> writes: > Do you need physical access? I have a pc98 machine I can put back on > the network. It has the 8251 chip in it. It also has a 16550 part as > well since it is a later model which had both... > > I believe that uart works for the 16550 part, but haven't tried it > lately... The uart probably works for some 16550 based devices but does not work for other one like multi-port devices. --- TAKAHASHI Yoshihiro <nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080704.221043.226715262.nyan>