Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 07:52:23 -0700 From: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org> To: Petri Helenius <pete@he.iki.fi> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Review needed: Mbuf double-free detection patch Message-ID: <20030501075222.A33903@xorpc.icir.org> In-Reply-To: <003901c30fde$37f2a0f0$932a40c1@PHE>; from pete@he.iki.fi on Thu, May 01, 2003 at 03:35:56PM %2B0300 References: <20030430142532.F3741@odysseus.silby.com> <20030501041210.A3514@xorpc.icir.org> <003901c30fde$37f2a0f0$932a40c1@PHE>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, May 01, 2003 at 03:35:56PM +0300, Petri Helenius wrote: ... > Allocating / freeing mbufs is quite expensive already so it probably does not make > that huge a difference. However the direction should be to improve the perfomance. it is not clear at all that a function call is more expensive than replicating a relatively large chunk of code. In fact, i have had quite a few surprise in the past when making a function __inline and the code turning out slower than the original. cheers luigi > Pete > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030501075222.A33903>