Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 19 Aug 2013 07:26:19 -0700
From:      Alfred Perlstein <alfred@ixsystems.com>
To:        Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org>
Cc:        "stable@freebsd.org" <stable@freebsd.org>, "re@freebsd.org" <re@freebsd.org>, "nonesuch@longcount.org" <nonesuch@longcount.org>
Subject:   Re: status of autotuning freebsd for 9.2
Message-ID:  <19B7F957-EF1D-4452-986A-3F4C51CA647E@ixsystems.com>
In-Reply-To: <5211EAD0.1060404@freebsd.org>
References:  <51D90B9B.9080209@ixsystems.com> <51D92826.1070707@freebsd.org> <51D9B24B.8070303@ixsystems.com> <51DACE93.9050608@freebsd.org> <520DC77C.1070003@ixsystems.com> <520DE306.4080004@freebsd.org> <5211EAD0.1060404@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Aug 19, 2013, at 2:52 AM, Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> wrote:

> On 16.08.2013 10:29, Andre Oppermann wrote:
>> On 16.08.2013 08:32, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>>> Andre, I'm kind of bummed out this didn't make it into 9.2, I'm wonderin=
g can I commit this to
>>> 9-stable now?  (or is it already in?)
>>=20
>> It didn't make it because there was only sparse feedback after the
>> call for testers.  There were a couple of replies that it is being
>> tested but no statements either way if it was good or not.  Hence
>> I erred on the side of caution and refrained from committing it.
>=20
> Revisiting the history of this after vacation absence actually shows
> that we straddled the release code freeze deadline and you had provided
> good testing feedback.  However the MFC got rejected by RE on the fear
> of introducing unknown regressions into the release process.
>=20
>>> Would you do the honors?
>>=20
>> Yes, will do later today.
>=20
> Committed to stable/9 as r254515.
>=20
> Let me know if there are any issues.

Thanks Andre.

 Maybe we can do a point release/patch release with this in a few weeks for 9=
.2.1 or 9.2p1 because 9.2 out of the box performance is abysmal not only in n=
etworking but also disk as maxvnodes is clipped way too small even with plen=
ty of ram.=20

>=20
> --=20
> Andre
>=20



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19B7F957-EF1D-4452-986A-3F4C51CA647E>