Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 25 Mar 2001 12:09:34 +0200 (CEST)
From:      Soren Schmidt <sos@freebsd.dk>
To:        linux@senet.com.au (Benjamin Close)
Cc:        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: ICH2-M IDE controller
Message-ID:  <200103251009.MAA52717@freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.33.0103251002210.594-200000@bytes4u.nodomain.yet> from Benjamin Close at "Mar 25, 2001 10:19:13 am"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
It seems Benjamin Close wrote:
> Hi All,
> 	Is anyone looking at supporting the Intel ICH2-M IDE controller?

Yes.

> This controller is basically the same as the ICH2 controller except it has
> extra powermanagment features as it's the for portable computers (hence
> the M=mobile). I'm currently using the attached patch which runs
> flawlessly on my laptop. However, I'm just an amature code hacker and
> hence can't guarentee I haven't missed something between the chipsets.

This patch seems about right, I have something very semilar in one
of my trees here, just I havn't had a chance to test it yet, but
if this works for you I guess I have my case :)

> The other question I have is why in ata-dma.c is there the fall through to
> the ICH chipset? It seems to prevent any drive actually using ATA100/UDMA5
> features.

The fallthrough is just for modes less than ATA100 which is setup the
same way as on the ICH therefore the same code..

-Søren

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200103251009.MAA52717>