Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 12:08:07 +0200 From: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> To: "Long, Scott" <Scott_Long@adaptec.com> Cc: "'Kent Stewart'" <kstewart@owt.com>, Will Andrews <will@csociety.org>, Scott Long <scott_long@btc.adaptec.com>, current@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cdrtools doesn't build on -current Message-ID: <3DB12F07.4060000@gmx.net> References: <6100BCEB85F8E244959C756C04E0EDD161CAD9@otcexc01.otc.adaptec.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigD6545AE245A650E85431DD68 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Long, Scott wrote: > All I'm asking is that ports maintainers make > an effort to maintain their ports. Will's accertation that it's an > all or nothing issue is certainly not productive, and neither is the > 'us versus them' inuendo here. The single one -CURRENT vs. -STABLE difference that causes many easy to fix breakages is really gcc. Port-maintainers are quite the pigs in the middle when ports break because of gcc3's pickyness, the original authors of the ported software might not use (or care) gcc3 themselves and not every port-maintainer has access to a -CURRENT machine to provide selfmade patches. -- Michael Nottebrock "And the reasons? There are no reasons." --------------enigD6545AE245A650E85431DD68 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Netscape - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE9sS8KXhc68WspdLARArIiAJsGe4F49YeJWqDZIsdCdaUilHMtNwCghYDP nyBK0QzFwUFyVF9cYW6zhwI= =s+Lo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigD6545AE245A650E85431DD68-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3DB12F07.4060000>