Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2000 11:44:09 +0900 From: Hajimu UMEMOTO (=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCR19LXBsoQiA=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCSCUbKEI=?=) <ume@mahoroba.org> To: des@flood.ping.uio.no Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fetch(1) Message-ID: <20000430114409R.ume@mahoroba.org> In-Reply-To: <xzp4s8lqde8.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> References: <xzp4s8lqde8.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>> On 29 Apr 2000 14:50:55 +0200 >>>>> Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> said: des> So, any arguments for or against importing it into -CURRENT? I have an IPv6fy patch for existing fetch(1) and libftpio, and intend to commit. I would like to merge it into your fetch(1) and libfetch, too. # The goal is IPv6 enabled installer. :) -- Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan ume@mahoroba.org ume@bisd.hitachi.co.jp ume@FreeBSD.org http://www.imasy.org/~ume/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000430114409R.ume>