Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 10:45:24 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Ganbold <ganbold@micom.mng.net> Cc: questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What is a "sane" setting for maxdsize when running amd64? it seems many normal suggestions do not apply. Message-ID: <864piq3ahn.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <46CCE3E5.9060100@micom.mng.net> (ganbold@micom.mng.net's message of "Thu\, 23 Aug 2007 09\:33\:25 %2B0800") References: <835936.35104.qm@web34510.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <A502D00B-80A7-4BC6-9842-D0A2A50E2026@mac.com> <86r6lvalht.fsf@ds4.des.no> <46CC16F6.7020904@micom.mng.net> <86ejhvai7g.fsf@ds4.des.no> <46CCE3E5.9060100@micom.mng.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ganbold <ganbold@micom.mng.net> writes: > We are using several squid machines (6 machines, each have all others > as a siblings) for transparent caching/proxying using gre tunnel and > wccp2 (with Cisco router). Can varnish work in such situation? Probably not; Varnish is a reverse proxy. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?864piq3ahn.fsf>