Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 14:41:31 +0200 From: Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely12.cicely.de> To: Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ticso@cicely.de, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ZFS to support chflags? Message-ID: <20070413124130.GF30772@cicely12.cicely.de> In-Reply-To: <461F7699.3020808@FreeBSD.org> References: <200704112004.03903.lists@jnielsen.net> <20070412021645.GQ30772@cicely12.cicely.de> <168809424.20070412205725@serebryakov.spb.ru> <20070412175525.GB30772@cicely12.cicely.de> <461F7699.3020808@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 04:24:57PM +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > Bernd Walter wrote: > > >Yes, but dump doesn't support ZFS and with ZFS you can much simpler > It is good point :) But flags can be used by `find' to prepare file > lists for backup too (on spnapshot, of course!). Usually file based backup software uses exclude patterns - often possible to setup in .something files. > >split out non backup directories in different filesystems. > Huh!? At least 2 FS for each active user in system (and 3 for many of > them)? Why not? With ZFS I only see the kernel mount list as a possible problem, which AFAIK doesn't scale very well. Maybe someone else with more knowledge will comment on this point. -- B.Walter http://www.bwct.de http://www.fizon.de bernd@bwct.de info@bwct.de support@fizon.de
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070413124130.GF30772>