Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 23 Jul 1997 16:45:45 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Tim Vanderhoek <tim@ppp6564.on.sympatico.ca>
To:        Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
Cc:        ac199@hwcn.org, "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb@FreeBSD.ORG>, freebsd-chat@hub.freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: FTC regulating use of registrations 
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.96.970723163625.17671B-100000@ppp6564.on.sympatico.ca>
In-Reply-To: <199707231851.MAA14333@rocky.mt.sri.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 23 Jul 1997, Nate Williams wrote:

> I disagree.  I live in Montana, where we have one of the lowest
> income/family in the nation.  And, due to it's 'ruralness' we haven't
> kept up with the 'standard' with two working parents, so most two-parent
> families leave one of them at home *in spite* of their low-income.  This
> is mostly due to what's acceptable from being a parent, and what's not
> in rural America.

There is a certain minimum that is acceptable.  I still think that
for many they would be below that minimum if only one parent was
working.


> It's all a matter of what's important.  Is having a car that < 3 years
> old, sending your kids to private schools, having nice furniture, or
> children that spend time with their parents more important?  It's all a
> matter of perspective.

Um.  Having both parents working does not guarantee one that one
will have these things at all, unfortunately.


--
 tIM...HOEk
OPTIMIZATION: the process of using many one-letter variables names
              hoping that the resultant code will run faster.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.970723163625.17671B-100000>