Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 11:33:34 -0500 From: Jacques Vidrine <nectar@FreeBSD.org> To: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> Cc: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: making <description> optional Message-ID: <825857C8-F6B4-11D8-9236-000A95BC6FAE@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <86914F26-F516-11D8-8CAA-00039312D914@fillmore-labs.com> References: <86914F26-F516-11D8-8CAA-00039312D914@fillmore-labs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Aug 23, 2004, at 10:10 AM, Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > I have a supplementary databases that are as much `personal' as vuxml > is. The portaudit text database has been announced and documented as > mentioned in a previous discussion. I'm sorry, I couldn't find that text (`Please contact [...]') anywhere in portaudit.txt or related files. Now I realize that is generated in the pages at ~eik/portaudit. I think we're on the same page now. > Anyway, I think making the entry optional would be the best solution, > but if you prefer a placeholder, we can keep `Please contact the > FreeBSD Security Team for more information'. I prefer an actual description, but OK :-) > Whatever you like. Simply using dummy values is fine with me. For the sake of harmony, let's agree that setting <discovery>unknown</discovery> is acceptable for now. Gimme a few days to check that stuff doesn't break when processing said entry. Cheers, -- Jacques A Vidrine / NTT/Verio nectar@celabo.org / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@freebsd.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?825857C8-F6B4-11D8-9236-000A95BC6FAE>