Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 17:58:00 -0600 From: "Donald J. O'Neill" <donaldj1066@fastmail.fm> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Gert Cuykens <gert.cuykens@gmail.com> Subject: Re: error xserver Message-ID: <200503151758.00873.donaldj1066@fastmail.fm> In-Reply-To: <ef60af09050315151250803d0@mail.gmail.com> References: <ef60af09050315080329f66b94@mail.gmail.com> <ef60af0905031514556d68b7a2@mail.gmail.com> <ef60af09050315151250803d0@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 15 March 2005 05:12 pm, Gert Cuykens wrote: > portmanager -sl said i could safely delete it becuase it was a leaf > so i nuked it :) > > after that i did a portmanager -u that resulted in a long sleep on my > keyboard. It did not put the xserver thingies back. How ever i did > some pkg_delete and portsclean at the same time to try to make > portmanager faster because it was always checking the same dependency > problems about gedit and nautulus and ... every time between > compiling a new port. i know i know!!!! i said to the pc screen but > portmanager did not listen and keep on checking and checking slowing > down the hole process doing nothing. So Gert, did you put your missing xorg ports back in. I also have to tell you, just because - portmanager or pkg-cutleaves - says that it's OK to take something out, doesn't mean it's so, it tells you that you better know what you are taking out. In point of fact - it's not nice to nuke your xorg ports, Don -- Donald J. O'Neill donaldj1066@fastmail.fm I'm not totally useless, I can be used as a bad example. Besides, I have a really great Airedale.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200503151758.00873.donaldj1066>