Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 21:24:17 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD & Software RAID Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0905272123120.54285@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <20090527190230.GB9937@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> References: <4A1AA3DC.5020300@network-i.net> <200905271048.27837.kirk@strauser.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0905271832320.53013@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <200905271152.34237.kirk@strauser.com> <20090527190230.GB9937@Grumpy.DynDNS.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I haven't looked at the ZFS code but this sort of thing is exactly why > all code I write uses int8_t, int16_t, int32_t, uint8_t, ... even when > the first thing I have to do with a new compiler is to work out the > proper typedefs to create them. int, short and char are portable, only other things must be defined this way. int8_t int16_t is just unneeded work. anyway - it's just defines, having no effect on compiled code and it's performance.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.0905272123120.54285>