Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 01:03:39 -0800 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: michael.copeland@gmail.com Cc: perrin@apotheon.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors Message-ID: <49437a6b.UDOGOuQZN1pqH%2B/y%perryh@pluto.rain.com> In-Reply-To: <4942D456.3050207@gmail.com> References: <20081211190951.GB845@comcast.net> <20081211113257.405a082c@gom.home> <20081211202023.GC845@comcast.net> <20081211134622.15c81ecd@gom.home> <20081212002813.GD32300@kokopelli.hydra> <20081211170011.777236f8@gom.home> <20081212015814.GB32982@kokopelli.hydra> <20081211215036.526b2cad@gom.home> <20081212181148.GD36348@kokopelli.hydra> <20081212110745.7657ff59@gom.home> <20081212211111.GD37185@kokopelli.hydra> <4942D456.3050207@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> after reading all these posts, i've still come up with this > answer after looking .. > "freebsd - the power to serve" Might one reasonably surmise that "the power to serve" implies doing a good job of running server software? Like mail servers, FTP servers, web servers, file servers, database servers, ssh servers, even - gasp - X11 servers?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?49437a6b.UDOGOuQZN1pqH%2B/y%perryh>