Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 11:53:17 +0300 From: "Artem Kuchin" <matrix@itlegion.ru> To: "Boris Samorodov" <bsam@ipt.ru> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Filesystem corruption and bad perfomance with SRCS16 and PAE (raid 5 2TB) Message-ID: <013c01c74a95$ca217000$0c00a8c0@Artem> References: <001d01c74a27$25afd9d0$0c00a8c0@Artem><45C8E96C.4030902@antiszoc.hu> <004401c74a4b$8072fa90$0c00a8c0@Artem> <21342944@srv.sem.ipt.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 03:04:05 +0300 Artem Kuchin wrote: >> Andras Gót wrote: > >>> Can you try the AMD64 version on that server? > >> Um.. i have never tried anything AMD in my life. I thought >> AMD64 is only for AMD CPUs and this is Intel Xeon. >> Are you really suggesting installing FreeBSD for AMD64 >> on this Xeon server? Why? Should it help? > > You may be interested at reading: > http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.2R/hardware-amd64.html#PROC Actually i have read it many time before, but i guess, never paed attention ;) anyhow, this: "There may be some issues with 64-bit cleanliness in some (particularly older) drivers. Generally, drivers that already function correctly on other 64-bit platforms should work. FreeBSD/amd64 is a very young platform on FreeBSD. While the core FreeBSD kernel and base system components are generally fairly robust, there are likely to still be rough edges, particularly with third party packages." scares me. Do you really think it is better than PAE? -- Artem
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?013c01c74a95$ca217000$0c00a8c0>