Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 09:34:31 +0100 From: peter@bgnett.no (Peter N. M. Hansteen) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPFW or pf? Message-ID: <86u0ncng4o.fsf@amidala.datadok.no> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0503141643590.9462@Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE> (Andreas Davour's message of "Mon, 14 Mar 2005 16:47:00 %2B0100 (CET)") References: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0503141643590.9462@Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Andreas Davour <ante@Update.UU.SE> writes: > Can someone tell me if it's ok to just use IPFW on my STABLE system, or > is there some other knobs in the kernelconfig I should toggle to turn > off pf support? By default pf is compiled as a loadable module, which you load if you want to run pf, leave alone otherwise. Removing all traces of pf would likely take a bit of effort. -- Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/ http://www.datadok.no/ http://www.nuug.no/ "First, we kill all the spammers" The Usenet Bard, "Twice-forwarded tales"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86u0ncng4o.fsf>