Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 17:19:03 +0100 From: Dirk Engling <erdgeist@erdgeist.org> To: wishmaster <artemrts@ukr.net>, Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: preferred jail management tool Message-ID: <54C90BF7.2050402@erdgeist.org> In-Reply-To: <1422460591.608730864.q8oky1s8@frv34.fwdcdn.com> References: <CACfj5vKjiQHsy9VbOKFFcrBpyr3dmbkOOxTxCYhSyZrnrjRiaQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAHieY7TyxzC0aK-ErY2EbCmTJPykk_9G7Gd=CrZ9yxQ-77PynA@mail.gmail.com> <20150127012347.GA4940@lonesome.com> <20150127141239.V77290@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <54C71BC9.5010103@freebsd.org> <alpine.BSF.2.11.1501280833080.98963@wonkity.com> <1422460591.608730864.q8oky1s8@frv34.fwdcdn.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 28.01.15 17:11, wishmaster wrote: > This is not killer feature, this something "imperfection" (sorry, > Dirk. Without insults). No offense taken. Everyone has their own requirements and we worked out that you are not the run-of-the-mill ezjail customer. Fine. No need to convince others that your use case is the only valid one, though. I still think that the FHS has defined a decent line for what in a FreeBSD installation is static shareable and can be provided read only to all jails. If you have actual users with their own requirements you want to contain in a jail, they DO expect a vanilla installation to do their stuff with. And this is what ezjail was built for originally. erdgeist
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?54C90BF7.2050402>