Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 13 Dec 2008 15:14:17 -0500
From:      Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com>
To:        Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
Cc:        Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr>, Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com>, Michel Talon <talon@lpthe.jussieu.fr>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors
Message-ID:  <18756.6041.574155.725937@jerusalem.litteratus.org>
In-Reply-To: <20081213184751.N41297@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References:  <20081213143200.GA5026@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <18755.53118.854987.966113@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <20081213182336.V41178@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <87skosf02b.fsf@kobe.laptop> <20081213184751.N41297@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Wojciech Puchar writes:

>  so stop asking on FreeBSD group about flash support. it's not
>  FreeBSD developers job.

	Except Flash support depends (/inter alia/) on the Linux
emulation layer, which has been accepted as part of the "FreeBSD 
developers" job.  Indeed, I get the feeling Flash is sort of a quiet
proxy for the general health of a number of less well known but
nonetheless useful bits and pieces.



				Robert Huff




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?18756.6041.574155.725937>