Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 22:16:20 +0200 From: Eitan Adler <eadler@freebsd.org> To: Mikhail Teterin <mi@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r318714 - in head/security/sudosh3: . files Message-ID: <CAF6rxgkshUJhsfNbsxHWymF5MBoQ3CkoaDncJ%2BeQB6uo0z8O6A@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201305211629.r4LGTJn3060919@svn.freebsd.org> References: <201305211629.r4LGTJn3060919@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 21 May 2013 18:29, Mikhail Teterin <mi@freebsd.org> wrote: > Author: mi > Date: Tue May 21 16:29:19 2013 > New Revision: 318714 > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/318714 > > Log: > Refactor the replay code to fix the reported vulnerability -- simply use mmap() > instead of a buffer. Is there a new version of this program upstream? > While here, fix warnings -- well enough for gcc48 to be happy with ``-Wall -W''. Changes like this are annoying because they make it harder to see what actually is required to be reported upstream. Is there a reason warnings can't be disabled? IMHO fixing "argument unused" errors in ports code is not very important. -- Eitan Adler Source, Ports, Doc committer Bugmeister, Ports Security teams
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgkshUJhsfNbsxHWymF5MBoQ3CkoaDncJ%2BeQB6uo0z8O6A>