Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 21:04:42 +0100 From: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za> To: Jens Rehsack <rehsack@liwing.de> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Administrivia: Discussion - Making this list subscriber-only Message-ID: <200208272004.g7RK4gl5023435@grimreaper.grondar.org> In-Reply-To: <3D6BD999.10753D8E@liwing.de> ; from Jens Rehsack <rehsack@liwing.de> "Tue, 27 Aug 2002 21:57:13 %2B0200." References: <3D6BD999.10753D8E@liwing.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Hmm. Most gurus will avoid it, and I suspect it will become a > > duplicate of freebsd-questions. > > I don't believe that. I can surely speak for the germans here - I know > many of the would respond to questions if -security-questions. And if > I'm honest, many questions I see in -questions I'd like to see in f.e. > -security(-questions), because the -questions is a very low knowledge list. Hmm. OK. I'll bite. Ask core for this formally, and convince them (us!) that this is needed, and I will champion your cause. > > OK - you have a deal! If you annoy us properly by submitting enough > > good-quality documenation upgrades, I'll punish you by a) ensuring they > > are committed, and b) if enough of them come, ensuring that you can commit > > them your damn self ;-) > > a) ok > b) not ok. I'm a developer and boss of a small company. I do not have > enough time to "really" prove into last final detail and the risk > that I submit (because it has to be fast) not enought tested and > verified stuff. :-) Enough of a) means that b) is inevitable! M -- o Mark Murray \_ O.\_ Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200208272004.g7RK4gl5023435>