Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:05:49 -0500
From:      Scott <info@sonservers.com>
To:        Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk>, Puna Tannehill <puna@imagescape.com>, <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Updating 5.2.1 Release #
Message-ID:  <200472910549.670990@IBM-R40>
In-Reply-To: <20040729144550.GC28698@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

=A0 ( =A0 What the original poster was thinking of is
=A0 ( =A0 the patchlevel that gets incremented every
=A0 ( =A0 time a new security (or nowadays: errata)
=A0 ( =A0 patch is applied to any of the -RELEASE
=A0 ( =A0 branches. =A0That modifies the OS name (ie.
=A0 ( =A0 the output of 'uname -r')

That is exactly right Matthew. I thought (assumed) that "#0" in the uname -a=
 output was the patchlevel of the OS. At this point in my life, I'm not so=
 concerned about what that number is, but rather I am running the most=
 secure and stable patchlevel available.

So if I set my cvs tag as Ezequiel (thank you) suggested:
change: *default release=3Dcvs tag=3DRELENG_5_2_1_RELEASE
to: *default release=3Dcvs tag=3DRELENG_5_2_1
That will get me the latest patches?

I'll make that change and rebuild again today.

Thanks all for your help. :)
Scott



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200472910549.670990>