Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 10:57:08 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org> To: "Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." <kdk@daleco.biz> Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: committers guide inconsistency Message-ID: <20040921075707.GA3123@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> In-Reply-To: <414F02CA.3040808@daleco.biz> References: <20040919122112.B56801@woozle.rinet.ru> <20040919105242.4ae37b40@localhost> <414F02CA.3040808@daleco.biz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2004-09-20 11:18, "Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." <kdk@daleco.biz> wrote: >Tom Rhodes wrote: >>On 19 Sep 2004 12:24:32 +0400 Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru> wrote: >>> Dear colleagues, >>> >>> <qandaentry> >>> <question> >>> <para>How long is a ports freeze?</para> >>> </question> [...] >> >>Are you not a doc committer too? If so then just fix it with a mentor >>approved patch; if not [...] > > Seems the favored term is "slush" rather than "freeze" for /doc since > 4.10, anyway ... do they have "slush" in .ru, or is everything frozen > year-round? :-D The change mentioned above refers to the ports tree though, which does have a "freeze". The "slush" of the doc tree is not really a freeze. At least, some changes can go in the /doc tree during the slush period too. - Giorgos
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040921075707.GA3123>