Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1998 09:25:47 -0400 From: Tim Vanderhoek <ac199@hwcn.org> To: Gregory Sutter <gsutter@pobox.com>, freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "Open Source Town Meeting" supports only one faction Message-ID: <19980722092547.C16686@zappo> In-Reply-To: <19980721223151.B15764@notabene.zer0.org>; from Gregory Sutter on Tue, Jul 21, 1998 at 10:31:51PM -0700 References: <Pine.GSO.3.95.980721182647.24542A-100000@shell> <Pine.BSF.3.96.980722005832.2295A-100000@lorax.ubergeeks.com> <19980722000542.56979@futuresouth.com> <19980721223151.B15764@notabene.zer0.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jul 21, 1998 at 10:31:51PM -0700, Gregory Sutter wrote: > > I know this will just stir up trouble in the thread, but... > if X11 was free software instead of just open source, TOG couldn't have > changed the license to a semicommercial one. Of course, if free in Naw, then they could just have demanded copyright assignment like the FSF and then have changed the license into a fully commercial one. -- This .sig is not innovative, witty, or profund. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980722092547.C16686>