Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 09:01:16 -0500 From: "Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." <kdk@daleco.biz> To: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: committers guide inconsistency Message-ID: <4150342C.9080908@daleco.biz> In-Reply-To: <20040921075707.GA3123@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> References: <20040919122112.B56801@woozle.rinet.ru> <20040919105242.4ae37b40@localhost> <414F02CA.3040808@daleco.biz> <20040921075707.GA3123@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >On 2004-09-20 11:18, "Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." <kdk@daleco.biz> wrote: > > >>Tom Rhodes wrote: >> >> >>>On 19 Sep 2004 12:24:32 +0400 Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru> wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Dear colleagues, >>>> >>>> <qandaentry> >>>> <question> >>>> <para>How long is a ports freeze?</para> >>>> </question> [...] >>>> >>>> >>>Are you not a doc committer too? If so then just fix it with a mentor >>>approved patch; if not [...] >>> >>> >>Seems the favored term is "slush" rather than "freeze" for /doc since >>4.10, anyway ... do they have "slush" in .ru, or is everything frozen >>year-round? :-D >> >> > >The change mentioned above refers to the ports tree though, which does have >a "freeze". The "slush" of the doc tree is not really a freeze. At least, >some changes can go in the /doc tree during the slush period too. > >- Giorgos > > Doh! Sorry for wasted time/bw.... KDK
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4150342C.9080908>