Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 23:41:03 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: ticso@cicely.de Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cleanup for cryptographic algorithms vs. compiler optimizations Message-ID: <86bpbe4nm8.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20100613162841.GE87112@cicely7.cicely.de> (Bernd Walter's message of "Sun, 13 Jun 2010 18:28:41 %2B0200") References: <20100611162118.GR39829@acme.spoerlein.net> <867hm5tl6u.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20100612153526.GA3632@acme.spoerlein.net> <20100612163208.GS87112@cicely7.cicely.de> <864oh86tnl.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20100612225216.GT87112@cicely7.cicely.de> <86k4q33pk2.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20100613160035.GD87112@cicely7.cicely.de> <86fx0q52r0.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20100613162841.GE87112@cicely7.cicely.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely7.cicely.de> writes: > Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav <des@des.no> writes: > > The only way you can tell that gcc did it is if you break the rules, > > such as by defining your own version of printf() or puts(). > Our loader stages do this for good reasons. And in microcontroller > programming (surely out of FreeBSD scope) it is done very regulary. Those are freestanding environments, where printf() and puts() don't exist as far as the C standard is concerned. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86bpbe4nm8.fsf>