Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 21:50:04 -0700 From: "Gordon Tetlow" <gordon@tetlows.org> To: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=" <des@des.no> Cc: Milo Hyson <milo@cyberlifelabs.com>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Curious about SCM choice Message-ID: <4e571dd70806292150vd6f47e1y430206f5a4a3d963@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <86tzfdwnd4.fsf@ds4.des.no> References: <E2C84A13-15E7-4BFE-B44F-A4C27966188C@cyberlifelabs.com> <4e571dd70806271037j59faed19y8d3e29423c9d8a2@mail.gmail.com> <86tzfdwnd4.fsf@ds4.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 9:11 AM, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav <des@des.no> wrote: > "Gordon Tetlow" <gordon@tetlows.org> writes: > > As an SCM expert at my place of employment, [...] > > As an SCM expert, you should know that neither CVS not Subversion are > SCM tools. Neither are any of the other systems you mention, except > perhaps, at a stretch, Perforce. They are version (or revision) control > systems. Ah, a problem with that acronym is it has 2 different meanings (which I think we were using different ones). I was meaning source code management, while I think you were meaning software configuration management? -gordon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4e571dd70806292150vd6f47e1y430206f5a4a3d963>