Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 17:11:05 -0400 From: Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com> To: questions@freebsd.org Cc: Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com> Subject: Re: changes to base system DNS Message-ID: <5324C1E9.6040802@rcn.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> "rcorder /etc/rc.d/* /usr/local/etc/rc.d/*" on the old and new systems > and compare the locations of named vs. local_unbound? On the current system, named comes up as number 74. Would someone who uses only unbound report how it works for them? Better yet - someone who's using port.bind? > So it depends on what capability you are looking for as to whether it starts earlier or later. (No easy answers here.) Short version: this system is authoritative for its zone, so a caching-only resolver is no good. Using system bind worked fine; everybody found everything they needed at the right time. I don't grok the rcorder system: it is my impression that everything in /etc/rc.d is provessed independently and before /usr/local/etc/rc.d. If that's true, then it seems like named might start after things that need its services. Respectfully, Robert Huff
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5324C1E9.6040802>