Date: Mon, 12 Aug 1996 20:53:50 +0200 From: roberto@keltia.freenix.fr (Ollivier Robert) To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs. NT Stability Message-ID: <199608121853.UAA02791@keltia.freenix.fr> In-Reply-To: <199608121739.NAA16750@etinc.com>; from Dennis on Aug 12, 1996 13:39:31 -0400 References: <199608121739.NAA16750@etinc.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
According to Dennis: > 1) Its rather new... > 2) It was written by Microsoft Blind bashing will never make things progress. >From what I've heard, NT is probably the first thing ever written by Microsoft that can be called "Operating System" even if I don't agree with many architectural and protocol choices (but I'm partial to Unix). It has flaws and bugs but which OS doesn't ? -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- The daemon is FREE! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 2.2-CURRENT #17: Fri Aug 2 20:40:17 MET DST 1996
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199608121853.UAA02791>