Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 13:38:26 +0200 From: Marc Olzheim <marcolz@stack.nl> To: Marc Olzheim <marcolz@stack.nl>, Tim Robbins <tjr@freebsd.org>, Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, freebsd-current@www.freebsd.org Subject: Re: Unified getcwd() implementation Message-ID: <20040507113826.GB94118@stack.nl> In-Reply-To: <20040507113654.GA94118@stack.nl> References: <20040507092235.GA61837@stack.nl> <20040507100119.GA15782@cat.robbins.dropbear.id.au> <20040507105355.GA93808@stack.nl> <20040507112928.GA14419@isis.wad.cz> <20040507113654.GA94118@stack.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 01:36:54PM +0200, Marc Olzheim wrote: > Which contains only BSD license suff, plus a NetBSD and OpenBSD CVS > id: > > /* $OpenBSD: linux_getcwd.c,v 1.2 2001/05/16 12:50:21 ho Exp $ */ > /* $NetBSD: vfs_getcwd.c,v 1.3.2.3 1999/07/11 10:24:09 sommerfeld Exp $ > */ > > What does this have to do with the FSF ? But I agree that the license header of vfs_cache.c should be merged with that of linux_getcwd.c, btw. Marc
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040507113826.GB94118>