Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 7 May 2004 07:40:43 -0500
From:      "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Martin Stiemerling <stiemerling@netlab.nec.de>
Cc:        Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Default behaviour of IP Options processing
Message-ID:  <20040507124043.GA1136@lum.celabo.org>
In-Reply-To: <2147483647.1083923460@[10.1.1.109]>
References:  <200405061846.i46Ik3Jc060969@repoman.freebsd.org> <409A8EF3.5825EF0C@freebsd.org> <2147483647.1083923460@[10.1.1.109]>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 09:51:00AM +0200, Martin Stiemerling wrote:
> Anyway, setting the default to reject packets is IMHO not 
> a good idea,

After a night's sleep, I also agree.  Emitting ICMP messages is
probably a bad, bad default.

Cheers,
-- 
Jacques Vidrine / nectar@celabo.org / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@freebsd.org



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040507124043.GA1136>