Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:56:05 +0800 From: Sepherosa Ziehau <sepherosa@gmail.com> To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Questions on processing smaller frame size Message-ID: <ea7b9c170902262156ga4feed5x69b271d94cda24a4@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <go37mi$9eu$1@ger.gmane.org> References: <a27b90e40902242314w12c15fddma43e1cd5afec8938@mail.gmail.com> <20090225075310.GA85904@svzserv.kemerovo.su> <a27b90e40902250239x414d3fa7l12d291d278162377@mail.gmail.com> <go37mi$9eu$1@ger.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> wrote: > > There is a very experimental patch to the em driver, not endorsed by the > em driver author (for unknown reasons) that some users claim helps with > SMP performance. See > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2008-December/020441.html > What's the interrupt rate of the above driver if you do: netperf -H remote-ip -t UDP_STREAM -l 60 -- -m 1472 Anyone has tried it? Best Regards, sephe -- Live Free or Die
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ea7b9c170902262156ga4feed5x69b271d94cda24a4>