Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 21 Sep 2006 15:11:09 +0100
From:      RW <list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: How "real time" is FreeBSD?
Message-ID:  <200609211511.10829.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com>
In-Reply-To: <a05210219c137cf40a13e@[10.0.0.10]>
References:  <4511E5E6.2020504@averageadmins.com> <5.1.0.14.2.20060920234610.06492910@209.152.117.178> <a05210219c137cf40a13e@[10.0.0.10]>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 21 September 2006 06:12, Walt Pawley wrote:
> At 11:47 PM -0500 9/20/06, W. D. wrote:
> >Just reading this about Linux on ZDNet and was wondering:
> ><http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9593_22-6117479.html?part=rss&tag=feed&subj=zd
> >nn>
>
> Cybernetic floobydust, IMHO.

If you read what the banker says: " for each thousandth of a second that its 
trading software can act faster than competitors' software, the company would 
see $100 million a year in new revenue."

It seems to me that they are really misunderstanding the problem. What they 
need is a system that's fast most of the time, rather than one that meets an 
arbitary deadline all the time. In other words they need a fast system, not a 
realtime system.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200609211511.10829.list-freebsd-2004>