Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:44:32 +0200 From: KES <kes-kes@yandex.ru> To: KES <kes-kes@yandex.ru> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re[3]: Can not set up two ADSL link to provider Message-ID: <47281477.20090129184432@yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: <14510195100.20090127212357@yandex.ru> References: <1292888884.20090127013434@yandex.ru> <79E49174-F6EC-4E97-AB7F-BCE05303A749@mac.com> <14510195100.20090127212357@yandex.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Здравствуйте, KES. Вы писали 27 января 2009 г., 21:23:57: K> Здравствуйте, Chuck. K> Вы писали 27 января 2009 г., 1:57:10: CS>> On Jan 26, 2009, at 3:34 PM, KES wrote: >>> I can not setup two ADSL PPPoE Links to same provider. >>> Because of imposibility to setup route for second connection >>> First connection gets: >>> ng0: flags=88d1<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,NOARP,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> >>> metric 0 mtu 1492 >>> inet 92.113.94.215 --> 195.5.5.203 netmask 0xffffffff >>> >>> Second can not be established because of: >>> Jan 27 01:27:55 kes mpd: [UKR_B4] IFACE: Add address >>> 92.113.94.249/32->195.5.5.203 to ng1 >>> Jan 27 01:27:55 kes mpd: [UKR_B4] IFACE: Adding IPv4 address to ng1 >>> failed: File exists CS>> You should talk to your network provider and ask them whether they CS>> want you to do multilink PPP or IEEE 802.3ad link aggregation. Either CS>> way, the bonding of the two connections should give you a single CS>> virtual network interface (tunX for the first, probably, and laggX in CS>> the second case) which has only a single route. CS>> For example: CS>> http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/erx/junose80/swconfig-physical/html/ethernet-config14.html CS>> ...talks about "After you configure the LAG bundle, you can route IP CS>> traffic over it, create a VLAN over it, or route PPPoE traffic over it." K> I do not want to aggregate links. I want use them as standalone K> I had two servers, two lans and two ADSLs. Now I have one server, four K> NICs: first LAN1, second LAN2, third ADSL1, forth ADSL2 K> I want to route LAN1 through ADSL1, LAN2 through ADSL2. LAN1/LAN2 must K> not interact with each other. For each LAN I use its own FIB (routing K> table). K> Only one problem: I can not run setup two PPPoE link if for second K> link is leased same gateway as for first K> So, is it possible to workaround this problem? In any case I is impossible to talk to my provider. It will change nothing. This is country wide provider. They said: "if you can not configure that on one machine then you must use two.. ((((" Also NOTICE: when I setup second PPPoE connection I setfib 1 (second routing table). So route must be added to second routing table and must not conflict with first, but it does -- С уважением, KES mailto:kes-kes@yandex.ru
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47281477.20090129184432>