Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 14:05:57 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Mike Jakubik <mikej@rogers.com> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1 Message-ID: <20060502180557.GA91762@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <44579EE1.6010300@rogers.com> References: <20060502171853.GG753@dimma.mow.oilspace.com> <20060502172225.GA90840@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060502174429.GH753@dimma.mow.oilspace.com> <44579EE1.6010300@rogers.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 02:03:13PM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote: > Dmitriy Kirhlarov wrote: > >Hi! > > > >On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 01:22:26PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > =20 > >>>I think it's same problem as in thread "fsck_ufs locked in snaplk". > >>>Is this problem fixed in fresh 6.1-PRE? > >>> =20 > >>I think we've reproduced the problem, but it probably won't be fixed > >>before the release. Sorry, the bug reports came too late in the > >>release cycle. > >> =20 > > > >Imho, it's bad idea -- create release with so important bug. It's not > >coda, unionfs or something else. It's very useful. > >I think, postpone release for fix this issue -- more fine. > > =20 >=20 > Ditto, same thing with the recent nve fixes. Why release known broken=20 > code when there are tested patches available? Whats the worst that will= =20 > happen? It wont work? Thats already the case... What patches? If you're talking about the mpsafe quota patches, they don't address the deadlocks. Kris --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEV5+EWry0BWjoQKURAhcMAJ9exWDv7HJGH1wGmyXKAN8yn6IONgCgmdbl U8oLEAWs7jd3+nd8YazhbJQ= =4lEr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060502180557.GA91762>