Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 03:42:20 +0300 (MSK) From: "."@babolo.ru To: Akinori MUSHA <knu@iDaemons.org> Cc: "."@babolo.ru, freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/46854: ports/lang/ruby/files/patch-defines.h includes RCS ids Message-ID: <1043541740.202494.9664.nullmailer@cicuta.babolo.ru> In-Reply-To: <863cng6bvr.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> At Sun, 26 Jan 2003 02:28:05 +0300 (MSK), > "."@babolo.ru wrote: > > What is the intention of this chunk: > > Why should I have an intention? Obviously it's part of what cvs diff > produces. It was handy for me as a port maintainer to just put a diff > produced by cvs diff, and there was no problem with it. Using ports tree as is without changes is not the only model of use. Propagation tweaked tree via cvs can screw RCS Ids. Yes you are free to not clean up diffs from unnecessary chunks if want. It is my wish only. > > and can it be wiped out from patch-defines.h ? > The whole patch was gone when I updated the port last night. > > > Please. > Now your configuration problem is hidden for a while. Good for you.. Source tree modifications is configuration problem? May be, may be... Thank you very much To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1043541740.202494.9664.nullmailer>