Date: Mon, 12 Aug 1996 16:39:22 -0400 From: dennis@etinc.com (Dennis) To: roberto@keltia.freenix.fr (Ollivier Robert) Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs. NT Stability Message-ID: <199608122039.QAA17952@etinc.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>According to Dennis: >> 1) Its rather new... >> 2) It was written by Microsoft > >Blind bashing will never make things progress. > >>From what I've heard, NT is probably the first thing ever written by >Microsoft that can be called "Operating System" even if I don't agree with >many architectural and protocol choices (but I'm partial to Unix). > >It has flaws and bugs but which OS doesn't ? Exactly my point. Its a new horizen for a company with a history of a long learning curve. Dennis
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199608122039.QAA17952>