Date: Tue, 6 Apr 1999 11:11:29 -0600 From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: Ted Faber <faber@ISI.EDU> Cc: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>, NAKAGAWA Yoshihisa <y-nakaga@nwsl.mesh.ad.jp>, Nick Sayer <nsayer@quack.kfu.com>, freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Any success with CirrusLogic 6729/6730??? Message-ID: <199904061711.LAA16507@mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <199904061709.KAA24369@boreas.isi.edu> References: <199904061703.LAA16410@mt.sri.com> <199904061709.KAA24369@boreas.isi.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >> I do think that setting up the pcic code to take a port at kernel > >> config time is a reasonable thing to do. > > > >You wouldn't get any argument from anyone, but how to do it? Making the > >PCIC an ISA device is unacceptable, > > That was my first thought. Why is it unacceptable? (I just don't > know, and it may help me come up with a better idea.) Because as you can tell, the PCIC code is *NOT* ISA specific. It's ISA-like, but not ISA specific. The code has no ISA code in it, except to deal with ISA devices (if it does, it should be removed). Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199904061711.LAA16507>