Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 4 Aug 2006 16:06:06 -0300 (ADT)
From:      User Freebsd <freebsd@hub.org>
To:        Antony Mawer <fbsd-questions@mawer.org>
Cc:        Olivier Nicole <on@cs.ait.ac.th>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Stand up and be counted - BSDStats Project
Message-ID:  <20060804160529.I25268@ganymede.hub.org>
In-Reply-To: <20060804132603.O25268@ganymede.hub.org>
References:  <20060803180553.B6529@ganymede.hub.org> <200608040314.k743EBK6050609@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <44D3262B.2000400@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20060804101513.R25268@ganymede.hub.org> <44D34C9D.50308@mawer.org> <20060804132603.O25268@ganymede.hub.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 4 Aug 2006, User Freebsd wrote:

> On Fri, 4 Aug 2006, Antony Mawer wrote:
>
>> On 4/08/2006 3:17 AM, User Freebsd wrote:
>>> On Fri, 4 Aug 2006, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>>> 
>>>> This is cool and all, but why are the concentration solely on PCI 
>>>> devices? pciconf output doesn't tell you directly what CPUs are in the 
>>>> system or even how many there are.  It doesn't tell you exactly what sort 
>>>> of memory or disk drives the system uses -- all of which would be 
>>>> important information that might just persuade hardware manufacturers to 
>>>> provide more FreeBSD support. Surely a condensed version of 
>>>> /var/run/dmesg.boot is more to the point.
>>> 
>>> /var/run/dmesg.boot can't be relied on, unfortunately ... I've had *many* 
>>> times where a reboot leaves that blank, or with "non-dmesg like" output 
>>> ... if you can provide a non-dmesg method of adding this information that 
>>> is consistent (ie. pciconf), then sure, we can add this sort of 
>>> information ...
>> 
>> Some of this information can be gathered from the hw.* sysctl's, at least 
>> on 6.x...
>
> 'k, what I'm going to work on this weekend is a first pass at both the 
> periodic script, and the receiving database ... I will post the script when 
> completed, so that we can test what has been discussed so far, then we can 
> look at adding on 'features' from there to pull in more information ...
>
> Fair enough?

BTW, if anyone out there likes doing HTML and web pages, please let me 
know ... anything *I* do will be as utilititarian as I can make them :)

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy@hub.org                              MSN . scrappy@hub.org
Yahoo . yscrappy               Skype: hub.org        ICQ . 7615664



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060804160529.I25268>