Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 21:40:22 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, utisoft@gmail.com, Chris Rees <utisoft@googlemail.com> Subject: Re: Remotely edit user disk quota Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0905282139240.61809@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <20090528194032.e31ec225.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <200905281030.n4SAUXdA046386@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <200905280847.12966.kirk@strauser.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0905281553001.60364@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <200905280904.44025.kirk@strauser.com> <20090528183801.82b36bbb.freebsd@edvax.de> <b79ecaef0905281004h7a1f40cvb65f005d9ebe5318@mail.gmail.com> <20090528194032.e31ec225.freebsd@edvax.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> But if it is, why not? At least, the OP's description involving some time ago i heard from linux user that rshd is removed at all "because it's insecure". Just got another example how good decision i made moving away from it.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.0905282139240.61809>