Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 20:04:57 -0500 From: "Matt Emmerton" <matt@gsicomp.on.ca> To: "Mark Linimon" <linimon@lonesome.com>, "Colin Percival" <colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Where is FreeBSD going? Message-ID: <00bd01c3d4ba$45367bf0$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca> References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0401061417540.17348-100000@pancho> <6.0.1.1.1.20040106204233.04436d28@imap.sfu.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> At 20:31 06/01/2004, Mark Linimon wrote: > >There are hundreds of PRs still to be processed that do have > >patches -- in fact, on most days the backlog is getting bigger, > >not smaller. > > Speaking of which... if there's one thing which could be done > to improve committer / non-committer relations, it would be to > *do* something with all those PRs. > The ports team is pretty good -- my maintainer updates have > always been committed fairly quickly -- but I've never had a > src patch committed without badgering committer(s) about my PRs. > > Don't misunderstand me; I think the project is heading in the > right direction, and committers are doing a great job. But I > think the contributions of non-committers could make FreeBSD > even better, and those contributions are being largely lost or > ignored. Exactly. I've filed PRs that have languished for months, and then after picking some random person from -current or -stable, the patches in the PR get committed within a week. I'd imagine that there's a lot of PRs that get dropped because they sit for 6+ months and then the submitter can't be found or cannot reproduce the situation. I think the problem is that too many commiters are focused on their own corner of the project, and there's nobody left to handle all the "general" sort of PRs. -- Matt Emmerton
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?00bd01c3d4ba$45367bf0$1200a8c0>